專家「聯」綫:投資級別債券:在挑戰中見機遇(只提供英文版本)



  • High fundamental stability and positive real yields
  • Buffer against different economic scenarios
  • Positive correlation effects in a portfolio
  • Changing market structure increases liquidity
  • Possible shift away from the US dollar supports demand for euro credits

Corporate bonds with good and very good credit ratings remain an asset class of choice for investors seeking stability in their portfolios. Valuations are currently attractive, and given the loss of confidence in the US dollar, this asset class offers a good diversification opportunity in the eurozone.

The supply of new corporate bonds was again record-breaking in May and June, but was well absorbed due to continued high demand. Investment-grade corporate bonds in particular have proven to be a robust portfolio component in recent quarters. Now that the markets have performed well, it is time to take stock. We take a look at fundamental characteristics, changing market structures and the attractiveness of the asset class. Finally, we present a scenario analysis that investors can use to form their own view of expected performance based on their assessment of the economy and inflation.


Corporate bonds: better than government bonds?
Perhaps the most important feature of investment-grade corporate bonds is their low default rates. Defaults are rare and usually driven by fraud, as was recently the case with Wirecard. In addition, active security selection makes it possible to identify and avoid problem cases at an early stage. Even in the high-yield segment, driven by the overall stable economic development in Europe, there has been the exceptional situation that there has not been a single default in the eurozone in the past twelve months – even down to the CCC rating level.

As a result, some market participants already consider investment-grade bonds to be better than government bonds. It is indeed striking that some corporate bonds with globally diversified business models are offering lower yields than government issuers. For example, five-year bonds issued by French luxury goods group LVMH are yielding less than French government bonds . This is understandable from a fundamental perspective, as the business models of globally active companies are in some cases more broadly diversified than the value creation structure of a single country. In addition, the supply of new corporate bonds is lower than that of governments, especially those that want to significantly increase their debt in order to invest in defence and infrastructure modernisation. The crisis in the eurozone periphery in particular has shown that some companies can develop more stably in such a phase. In the longer term, however, it should be noted that if companies have a large part of their business model in the affected countries, it will be difficult to completely escape the negative developments on the government side. One example would be special taxes levied by the respective government to close its financing gap.


Changing market structures increase the liquidity of IG bonds
In addition to fundamental criteria , our experts monitor also changes in market structures . This allows structural shifts in the corporate bond market to be adequately taken into account. In recent years, for example, the use of technology in trading has increased significantly, and with it the number of so-called portfolio trades, i.e. block purchases or sales of entire bond portfolios. This offers new opportunities for active managers. It has made the market more liquid, even in periods of high volatility, and larger trades are easier and more efficient to execute, provided that the necessary market access is in place. Systematic trading strategies have been implemented on the equity side for some time now and further increase market liquidity. With good market access, it is also possible to successfully realise a significant alpha factor: namely, the collection of new issue premiums when placing bonds. Finally, a more liquid market also tends to mean lower credit risk premiums.


Euro 20 billion

In the eurozone, portfolio trades in investment-grade corporate bonds already reached an estimated volume of €20 billion in April. This means that the volume has roughly doubled compared to two years ago. This leads to a higher trading frequency: two years ago, an IG bond was not traded on average almost every third trading day, whereas now there are only about five days in ten without any transactions.


The shift away from the USD by global investors supports the medium-term outlook

Finally, the possible gradual shift away from the US dollar by global investors in view of the erratic policies of the US government not only risks, such as poses the depreciation of USD assets against the euro, but also opportunities. Admittedly, the additional demand from outside Europe that has been observed so far is still manageable. However, the shift of investment funds from the US dollar to the eurozone when maturing securities are reinvested provides support for the corporate bond market, especially when prices come under pressure and thus become more attractive in a global comparison. There is therefore currently something of a "dollar put" not only for the stock markets, but also for the European IG credit market.

Positive real yields and a steeper yield curve help
Since the temporary peak , corporate bond yields have fallen from around 4.5 per cent at the end of 2023 to 3.1 per cent (measured by the ICE BofA Corporate Index) . This is due to the favourable development of both the interest rate and credit markets. One reason for the continuing strong demand and the resulting decline in yields is certainly the still positive real yield due to the higher yield on corporate bonds compared to current inflation rates.

Inflation: Persistent divergence between the eurozone and the US
US: Inflation target clearly missed; eurozone just below 2 % target

Sources: National statistical offices, Macrobond, Union Investment. As of 2 July 2025. Forecasts as of June 2025

In addition, yield curves have steepened over the past two years. Around two years ago, for example, two-year German government bonds had a yield 0.8% higher than 10-year German government bonds. This effect has now reversed, and a similar trend can also be seen in the credit curves. This means that bond portfolios with largely constant interest rates over time are once again benefiting from the roll-down effect. Under current conditions, this accounts for around 0.5% of a standard corporate bond portfolio over a one-year horizon. The expected total return ( ) therefore rises from around 3% to around 3.5% over a 12-month horizon, provided that interest rates and credit spreads remain unchanged.

Steeper yield curves imply higher roll-down
Steeper yield curves – the roll-down is back

Source: Bloomberg, Union Investment, as at 30 June 2025

Source: ICE BofA, Union Investment; as of July 8, 2025. Indices: ER01, ER04

What are the return opportunities and risks for the future?
As a rule, investors rarely have uniform expectations about future economic and inflation developments as the driving forces for investment-grade markets. A scenario analysis helps to compare the expected return prospects with one's own economic scenarios.

High current interest rates protect against losses

Source: GCP, ICE BofA Merrill Lynch, as at 8 July 2025


The table above calculates the 12-month return expectation for an investment in the ICE BofA Euro Corporate Index (ER00) investment-grade corporate bond index under different interest rate and spread scenarios. Current income, roll-down and the effects of interest rate and spread movements are taken into account. The X-axis represents possible credit spreads (OAS) relative to German government bonds at index level, while the Y-axis represents different interest rates for five-year German government bonds that roughly correspond to the duration of the index. Thus, if the yield remained unchanged, on five-year German government bonds (2.26%) and the credit spread over German government bonds (0.8%) the 12-month return expectation would be 3.5%. If, for example, spreads rise to 1.05% in 12 months and yields remain unchanged, the return would be.7%.  2 over a 12-month period


We find it noteworthy that corporate bonds offer attractive and comparatively robust earnings prospects across various economic scenarios. On the one hand, current income and roll-down effects provide a buffer against price losses, for example in the event of rising capital market interest rates.

Furthermore, correlation effects often come into play. In a boom scenario with rising capital market yields, credit risks will generally decline, thereby at least partially offsetting interest rate curve-related price losses. Conversely, in the event of a significantly weaker economic development (recession), risk premiums would rise due to concerns about a deterioration in issuers' creditworthiness. However, this effect would also be at least partially offset by the more favourable interest rate markets. A stagflation scenario is less favourable, in which interest rates remain high due to higher inflation rates, putting pressure on bond prices , while at the same time subdued economic growth is likely to lead to greater concerns about creditworthiness and thus to rising risk premiums. In contrast, a severe recession scenario, as seen during the coronavirus pandemic, is not necessarily negative from an investor perspective. In such a scenario, the European Central Bank (ECB) could not only lower key interest rates to support the economy, but also potentially enter a new cycle of quantitative easing (QE3). This would provide considerable support for bond market prices. If corporate bonds are purchased, spreads are likely to remain narrow despite the difficult economic situation, as the fundamental soundness of companies is high.

However, in line with our economists' expectations, we anticipate a moderate scenario in which the eurozone economy gains some momentum and the US economy is slowed by the trade dispute but does not slip into recession. On balance, this should lead to a sideways trend in prices and thus in yields.


Corporate bonds as a key component in a portfolio contextCorporate bonds as a key component in a portfolio context

Investors could therefore not only achieve an attractive premium over government bonds with corporate bonds. The opposing effects of spread and interest rate changes mean that investment-grade bonds can serve as a stabilising asset class in a (multi-asset) portfolio . And not just within the bond component. In recent years, there have been repeated phases, at least temporarily, in which corporate bonds have shown a fairly low correlation with the equity markets. In some cases, they have performed better than government bonds, for example, in terms of their diversification function in a mixed portfolio, as the correlation with equities was temporarily higher . At the special fund level in particular, it is also no problem to take specific requirements into account, for example with regard to ESG criteria.

Source: Union Investment. All information, explanations and illustrations are as at 14 July 2025, unless otherwise stated